Often, the actual screen printing process was done by assistants, and not by Warhol himself. Warhol’s Triple Elvis sold for $100 million in 2008 With current printing technology, it’s possible to choose from an even more vast selection of art images and print them on a variety of surfaces. Until around twenty five years ago, basic hotel and motel art was printed as posters from a selection that came in catalogs. If you’ve ever looked closely at these paintings, though, you might notice that many of them are printed on canvas and then gessoed over in the same way as those courthouse portraits I saw years ago. However, the image so often associated with hotels is that of an kitsch landscape or flower with the appearance and texture of an oil painting. The gold standard for mass produced art has to be hotel art, which ironically enough, is shifting away from dusty kitsch landscapes and towards localized black and white photographs. It’s the idea that a print can be made “more of” by passing it off as a painting, which begs the question: are artworks lacking in handmade appearance valued less? What does mass production of art mean in relation to the handmade, and can the appearance of it mean a work of art has more or less cultural value? There is a theme through these encounters. I thought this odd at the time, but as it turns out this would only be the first of many encounters with paintings that were really not painted. Many an office decoration has turned out to be a print covered in tiny clear brushstrokes. The intention was to create the appearance of a painted surface. Not only were the portraits fairly high up and in the same sort of ornate frames, but care had been taken to paint a layer of textured gesso over the top. Surprisingly, this was rather hard to notice. This lineup of Judges is from the Oregon Historical Society, not my hometown
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |